This page aggregates together stuff having to do with Joey from elsewhere on the net.
This is really my policy for botshit. Adding links to relevant places on project websites.
https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/policy_on_adding_AI_generated_content_to_my_software_projects/
Was reading this old SCIAM and man, getting LISP on a chip because of AI hype was prime good old days. I somehow suspect that vector processors will not feature in any good old days feelings.
https://sciam-cms.s3.amazonaws.com/sciam/cache/file/1F6D8B0E-F272-47CB-A5B8C50440C45C6C.pdf
Long drive home, pondering seeding free software with (neutered) botshit to poison non-consensual LLM training.
By the way, I'd love for someone to tell me I've gotten some or all of this wrong! I really want to not lose my respect for SWH.
(No interest in debating LLM-as-copyright laundring here or ever tho. Or with any apologists for any corporations.)
(I should note that I've had considerable difficulty getting my software into Software Heritage in the first place, since I refuse to host it on Github. The irony.)
By facilitating a corporation that is attempting to set itself up as a governance over my community, how is Software Heritage not behaving in a way that runs counter to their mission statement of preserving software?
My immediate reaction is to consider removing my software from Software Heritage itself!
Asking to be removed from The Stack would implicitly legitimize this claim of governance over me.
"The Stack is an open governance interface between the AI community and the open source community."
This is a seizure of power. It is not legitimate governance.
Yes, the terms of use of The Stack require updating your copy of the dataset when it's updated to remove software https://huggingface.co/datasets/bigcode/the-stack-v2
But they say nothing about stopping using models already trained on that data.
And "the most recent usable version" gives considerable leeway. Presumably if we all removed all our software from The Stack, it would no longer be usable.
Also, interesting how THEIR terms matter, but MY terms don't
"3. Mechanisms should be established, where possible, for authors to exclude their archived code from the training inputs before model training begins. "
But in practice, they seem ok with this post-training removal process: https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/in-the-stack
The insufficiency is simple: When a LLM trained on software can output portions of copyrighted software, which they absolutely can and do, and when that gets used in proprietary software, all the provinance tracking of the dataset used to train it becomes irrelevant. At that point my license has been violated.
Software Heratige's statement's silence on this topic, in their list of principles, is deafening.
I am disappointed in Software Heritage.
They made this statement on using their archive as an AI training dataset: https://www.softwareheritage.org/2023/10/19/swh-statement-on-llm-for-code/?ref=openml.fyi
These seem like good principles. But they are not actually sufficient to respect our work. And the third is too weak, and appears to be providing a figleaf for extractive behavior.
anticipating the Realtor's class action settlement possibly paying me back a small portion of what was clearly daylight robbery when my realtor was like "oh and we'll pay this other Realtor(TM) 2.5% for finding these buyers for your house (the buyers absolutely found it on zillow)"
(Looks like the Realtors actually won again, since this settlement avoids another suite that "threatened a damages award of more than $40 billion", 100x as much.)
oblique strategies suggested "accretion" and um.... I think I've used that particular one perhaps enough already
Watching "It's Quieter in the Twilight", a documentary about Voyager mission control. Shaping up to be a great #documentary
my pickled pears went very well as a rice ball filling
plasma live reentry video was amazing while it lasted #starship
"plz hold for splashdown" #starship
caught the #starship launch and that was shot well
Impressive bit of QR art
putting together a NLnet grant proposal for adding some major features to #gitAnnex
this dude invented some precision tools
author: Leigh Bardugo
name: Joey
average rating: 4.03
book published: 2019
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/10/30
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Frank Herbert
name: Joey
average rating: 3.89
book published: 1969
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/10/22
shelves: currently-reading, re-read-in-2021
review:
author: Linda Nagata
name: Joey
average rating: 4.10
book published: 2019
rating: 3
read at:
date added: 2021/10/03
shelves: currently-reading
review:
Egan did the general extropian voyage better, but the murder ships are an interesting metaphor for Facebook.
author: Carlo Rovelli
name: Joey
average rating: 4.08
book published: 2020
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/09/18
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Rian Hughes
name: Joey
average rating: 3.92
book published: 2020
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/09/10
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Matt Bell
name: Joey
average rating: 3.55
book published: 2021
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/08/29
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: K.B. Spangler
name: Joey
average rating: 4.32
book published: 2021
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/03/25
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Arkady Martine
name: Joey
average rating: 4.53
book published: 2021
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/03/18
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Leonard Richardson
name: Joey
average rating: 3.91
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/01/23
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Simon Jimenez
name: Joey
average rating: 4.08
book published: 2020
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2020/05/19
shelves: currently-reading
review:
Github: "we use the same overarching policy framework as Microsoft"
That's so say, embrace, extend, extinguish. And deeply authoritarian & rent seeking.
There is is in black and white internal email for anyone who had a shadow of a doubt. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ljH74APGOTVl_dxs-H_f5M4YuvMUBfdq/view
@aza_leah so the best unix password ever was the very first one. It's all been downhill from there.
@substack yeah, I followed spider-farm when you were on scuttlebutt. I'm 100% offgrid too, and my house uses around 1/10th the US average energy.
But there's alternative and then there's mass market, like it or not, so I am excited when I see indications the mass market is making any kind of improvement.
@substack a fridge plugged into an IQ8 with a single 300w solar panel should be able to keep food cold on sunny days.
Fill the freezer with water for thermal mass and it will probably keep sufficiently cool overight with no power.
Add 2 more solar panels and IQ8's and it will run on cloudy days too.
That's a much simplified version of my offgrid fridge0.branchable.com needing none of its special components of software.
author: Amal El-Mohtar
name: Joey
average rating: 4.21
book published: 2019
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2019/07/24
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Ted Chiang
name: Joey
average rating: 4.40
book published: 2019
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2019/06/15
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Kim Stanley Robinson
name: Joey
average rating: 3.54
book published: 2018
rating: 3
read at:
date added: 2018/11/02
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Ken Ilgunas
name: Joey
average rating: 4.02
book published: 2018
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/10/09
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: James Smythe
name: Joey
average rating: 3.98
book published: 2018
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/09/29
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Ursula K. Le Guin
name: Joey
average rating: 3.81
book published: 2008
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/07/29
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Annalee Newitz
name: Joey
average rating: 3.51
book published: 2017
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2018/03/23
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Ari Walkingnorth
name: Joey
average rating: 4.59
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/03/14
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Ada Palmer
name: Joey
average rating: 4.20
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/12/27
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Mohsin Hamid
name: Joey
average rating: 3.81
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/10/06
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: N.K. Jemisin
name: Joey
average rating: 4.53
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/09/02
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Michael Swanwick
name: Joey
average rating: 3.85
book published: 1987
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/08/06
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Michael Swanwick
name: Joey
average rating: 3.84
book published: 1987
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/08/06
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Kim Stanley Robinson
name: Joey
average rating: 3.66
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/03/29
shelves: currently-reading
review:
author: Errol Hess
name: Joey
average rating: 0.0
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2016/11/01
shelves: currently-reading
review:
List of feeds:
- music: last checked (0 posts)
- mastadon posts: last checked (1035 posts)
- books: last checked (72 posts)